4.4 Article

Generation of a Novel Staphylococcus aureus Ghost Vaccine and Examination of Its Immunogenicity against Virulent Challenge in Rats

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 83, 期 7, 页码 2957-2965

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00009-15

关键词

-

资金

  1. Business for Cooperative R&D between Industry, Academy, and Research Institute - Korea Small and Medium Business Administration [C0191740]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [C0191740] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive pathogen that causes a wide range of infections in humans and animals. Bacterial ghosts are nonliving, empty cell envelopes and are well represented as novel vaccine candidates. In this study, we examined the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of S. aureus ghosts (SAGs) against a virulent challenge in rats. Nonliving SAGs were generated by using the MIC of sodium hydroxide. The formation of a transmembrane lysis tunnel structure in SAGs was visualized by scanning electron microscopy. To investigate these SAGs as a vaccine candidate, rats were divided into four groups, A (nonimmunized control), B (orally immunized), C (subcutaneously immunized), and D (intravenously immunized). The IgG antibody responses were significantly stronger in the SAG-immunized groups than in the nonimmunized control group (P < 0.05). Moreover, a significant increase in the populations of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells was observed in all three immunized groups (P < 0.05). We also found that serum bactericidal antibodies were significantly elicited in the SAG-immunized groups (P < 0.05). Most importantly, the bacterial loads in the immunized groups were significantly lower than those in the nonimmunized control group (P < 0.01). These results suggest that immunization with SAGs induces immune responses and provides protection against a virulent S. aureus challenge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据