4.7 Article

Effect of residual stresses on the onset of yielding in a Zr-based metallic glass

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 59, 期 20, 页码 7627-7633

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.029

关键词

Residual stresses; Onset of yielding; Metallic glasses; Nanoindentation; Glass transition

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-0905979, DMR-0909037]
  2. Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. UT College of Engineering
  4. US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Science, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50725104, 51010001]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [909037] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Materials Research [0905979] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Indentation experiments were performed on as-cast and elastically-bent-and-constrained Zr-based metallic glass samples to investigate the effect of strain rate and residual stresses on the onset of yielding in the material. The critical shear stress for the onset of yielding in the as-cast sample was found to be insensitive to the applied strain rate. By contrast, in the elastically-stressed sample, the maximum contact pressure from the Hertzian stress field at the onset of yielding was found to largely decrease under tensile residual stress, but only slightly increase under compressive residual stress. Despite the different residual stresses, the effective shear stress, i.e. the superimposition of residual and Hertzian stress fields, for the onset of yielding in the Zr-based metallic glass was essentially a constant. The constancy of the effective stress for the onset of yielding was discussed in light of a critical excess volume associated with the atomic structure upon loading. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据