4.7 Article

Prevalence of shear banding in compression of Zr41Ti14Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 pillars as small as 150 nm in diameter

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 57, 期 12, 页码 3562-3571

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.013

关键词

Bulk metallic glasses; In situ transmission electron microscopy; Shear banding; Size effect

资金

  1. NSFC [50890171, 10721202, 50571110]
  2. CAS [KJCX2-YW-MO4]
  3. MOST [2004CB619305]
  4. Student Fund of the Chinese Ministry of Education [20070699044]
  5. III Project of PR China [1307050]
  6. China Scholarship Council [[2007] 3020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, the size dependence of mechanical behaviors, particularly the yield strength and plastic deformation mode, of bulk metallic glasses (BMG) has created a great deal of interest. Contradicting conclusions have been drawn by different research groups, based on various experiments on different BMG systems. Based on in situ compression transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiments on Zr41Ti14Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 (Vit 1) nanopillars, this paper provides strong evidence that shear banding still prevails at specimen length scales as small as 150 nm in diameter. This is supported by in situ and ex situ images of shear bands, and by the carefully recorded displacement bursts under load control its well as load drops under displacement control. Finite element modeling of the stress state within the pillar shows that the unavoidable geometry constraints accompanying such experiments impart a strong effect on the experimental results, including non-uniform stress distributions and high level hydrostatic pressures. The seemingly improved compressive ductility is believed to be due to such geometry constraints. Observations underscore the notion that the mechanical behavior of metallic glasses, including strength and plastic deformation mode, is size independent at least in Vit 1. (C) 2009 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据