4.7 Article

Influence of oligomerically modified reactive montmorillonite on thermal and mechanical properties of aromatic polyamide-clay nanocomposites

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 56, 期 17, 页码 4905-4912

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.005

关键词

Nanocomposite; Thin films; X-ray diffraction; Transmission electron microscopy (TEM); Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (HEC) [20-23-ACAD (R) 03-410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Montmorillonite clay modified with the ammonium salt of amine terminated amide oligomer was employed in the preparation of aromatic polyamide/organoclay nanocomposites. Organoclay prepared was examined for its dispersion behavior in the polyamide matrix. High-molecular-weight amide chains were synthesized from 4,4'-oxydianiline and isophthaloyl chloride in dimethylacetamide. These amide chains were selectively end-capped with carbonyl chloride end groups to interact chemically with modified montinorillonite clay. The resulting composite films containing 2-20 wt.% of organoclay were characterized for TEM, XRD, thin film tensile testing; TGA, DSC and water absorption measurements. The distribution of organoclay and nanostructure of the composites were investigated by XRD and TEM analyses. Results from mechanical testing revealed that modulus and strength improved up to 6 wt.% clay loading while elongation and toughness of nanocomposites increased with the addition of 2 wt.% clay content in the matrix. Thermal decomposition temperatures of the nanocomposites were in the range 300-450 degrees C. These nanocomposites exhibited increase in the glass transition temperatures relative to pristine polyamide depicting interfacial interactions between the two phases. The percentage water absorption of these hybrids was found to be Much reduced upon the addition of modified layered silicate indicating decreased permeability. (c) 2008 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据