4.2 Article

Biochemical and immunohistochemical changes in delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-treated type 2 diabetic rats

期刊

ACTA HISTOCHEMICA
卷 116, 期 1, 页码 112-116

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2013.05.013

关键词

Delta(9)-THC; Type 2 diabetes; Insulin; Glucagon; Pancreas; Rat

资金

  1. Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University [7823]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The regulation of glucose, lipid metabolism and immunoreactivities of insulin and glucagon peptides by delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) in diabetes were examined in an experimental rat model. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups: (1) control, (2) Delta(9)-THC treated, (3) diabetic, and (4) diabetic + Delta(9)-THC. The type 2 diabetic rat model was established by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of nicotinamide (85 mg/kg body weight) followed after 15 min by i.p. injection of streptozotocin (STZ) at 65 mg/kg of body weight. Delta(9)-THC and Delta(9)-THC treated diabetic groups received 3 mg/kg/day of Delta(9)-THC for 7 days. The immunolocalization of insulin and glucagon peptides was investigated in the pancreas using a streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase technique. High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC) and total protein (TP) levels were measured in serum. Total islet area percent of insulin immunoreactive cells slightly changed in diabetic + Delta(9)-THC rats compared to diabetic animals. However, the area percent of glucagon immunoreactive cells showed a decrease in diabetic + Delta(9)-THC rats compared to that of diabetic animals alone. Serum TC, HDL and LDL levels of diabetes + Delta(9)-THC group showed a decrease compared to the diabetic group. These results indicate that Delta(9)-THC may serve a protective role against hyperlipidemia and hyperglycemia in diabetic rats. (C) 2013 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据