4.4 Article

Structure of human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 with the essential Mg2+ cofactor

期刊

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S0907444913027042

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-GM72711]
  2. American Cancer Society [RSG-09-058-01-GMC]
  3. Chemistry-Biology Interface (CBI) Training grant from the NIH [T32-GM066706]
  4. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  5. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P41GM103393]
  6. National Center for Research Resources [P41RR001209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) mediates the repair of abasic sites and other DNA lesions and is essential for base-excision repair and strand-break repair pathways. APE1 hydrolyzes the phosphodiester bond at abasic sites, producing 5'-deoxyribose phosphate and the 3'-OH primer needed for repair synthesis. It also has additional repair activities, including the removal of 3'-blocking groups. APE1 is a powerful enzyme that absolutely requires Mg2+, but the stoichiometry and catalytic function of the divalent cation remain unresolved for APE1 and for other enzymes in the DNase I superfamily. Previously reported structures of DNA-free APE1 contained either Sm3+ or Pb2+ in the active site. However, these are poor surrogates for Mg2+ because Sm3+ is not a cofactor and Pb2+ inhibits APE1, and their coordination geometry is expected to differ from that of Mg2+. A crystal structure of human APE1 was solved at 1.92 angstrom resolution with a single Mg2+ ion in the active site. The structure reveals ideal octahedral coordination of Mg2+ via two carboxylate groups and four water molecules. One residue that coordinates Mg2+ directly and two that bind inner-sphere water molecules are strictly conserved in the DNase I superfamily. This structure, together with a recent structure of the enzyme-product complex, inform on the stoichiometry and the role of Mg2+ in APE1-catalyzed reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据