4.8 Article

Extracellular calcium and CaSR drive osteoinduction in mesenchymal stromal cells

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 2824-2833

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.004

关键词

Calcium sensing receptor (CaSR); Extracellular calcium; Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs); Osteoinduction; Regenerative medicine

资金

  1. European Commission [NMP3-LA-2008-214402, PI11/03030]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [MAT2012-38793]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone is the main store of calcium and progenitor cells in the body. During the resorption process, the local calcium concentration reaches 8-40 mM, and the surrounding cells are exposed to these fluctuations in calcium. This stimulus is a signal that is detected through the calcium sensing receptor (CaSR), which modulates chemotactic and proliferative G protein-dependent signaling pathways. The objective of the present work is to evaluate the roles of extracellular calcium ([Ca2+](o)) and the CaSR in osteoinduction. Rat bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (rBMSCs) were stimulated with 10 mM of Ca2+. Several experiments were conducted to demonstrate the effect of [Ca2+](o) on chemotaxis, proliferation and differentiation on the osteoblastic lineage. It was found that [Ca2+](o) induces rBMSCs to migrate and proliferate in a concentration-dependent manner. Real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence also revealed that 10 mM Ca2+ stimulates overexpression of osteogenic markers in rBMSCs, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bone sialoprotein, collagen Ia1 and osteocalcin. Functional assays determining ALP activity and mineralization tests both corroborate the increased expression of these markers in rBMSCs stimulated with Ca2+. Moreover, CaSR blockage inhibited the cellular response to stimulation with high concentrations of [Ca2+](o), revealing that the CaSR is a key modulator of these cellular responses. (C) 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据