4.8 Article

Increased mucociliary differentiation and aquaporins formation of respiratory epithelial cells on retinoic acid-loaded hyaluronan-derivative membranes

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 6783-6789

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.038

关键词

Retinoic acid; Hyaluronan; HYAFF; Mucociliary differentiation; Aquaporins

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC-98-2314-B-418-001-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While playing a major role in maintaining the mucociliary phenotype of respiratory epithelial cells (RECs), retinoids are critical determinants of their normal function. However, despite being a powerful biological agent, retinoic acid (RA) is generally not used in regenerative medicine due to its scarce bioavailability via conventional administration. Therefore, the ability to incorporate RA into biomaterials allows for a combination of the biological effects of RA and biomaterials in influencing cellular behavior. This study attempts to develop RA-loaded hyaluronan-derivative membrane (RA-HAm) and investigates how this membrane affects the mucociliary differentiation and aquaporins (AQP) formation of RECs. In a simulated in vitro culture condition, the RA release from membranes is maintained for 7 days. On the seventh day, the cumulative release rate of RA from supportive biomaterials is similar to 87% under detect limitation. RECs cultured on RA-HAm reveal numerous mature ciliated cells and microvilli compared to aggregated cilia-like structures on hyaluronan-derivative membrane (HAm). Moreover, the expression levels of MUC5AC and AQP on RA-HAm are higher than those on HAm. The proposed model elucidates the release of hydrophobic RA from hyaluronan-derivative biomaterials. We believe that RA-loaded hyaluronan biomaterials are highly promising biomaterials for use in sinonasal surgery and tissue engineering of the respiratory system. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据