4.8 Article

Enhanced osseointegration of grit-blasted, NaOH-treated and electrochemically hydroxyapatite-coated Ti-6Al-4V implants in rabbits

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 2258-2269

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.033

关键词

Hydroxyapatite coating; Electrochemistry; Plasma spraying; Osseointegration; In vivo test

资金

  1. Department of Orthopedics at the Edith Wolfson Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osseointegration, in terms of the bone apposition ratio (BAR) and the new bone area (NBA), was measured by backscattered electron imaging. The results were compared for four implant types: grit-blasted and NaOH-treated Ti-6Al-4 V (Uncoated-NaOH), electrodeposited with hydroxyapatite without alkali treatment (ED-HAp), elect rodeposited with hydroxyapatite after alkali treatment (NaOH-ED-HAp), and plasma sprayed with hydroxyapatite (PS-HAp). No heat treatment was done after soaking in NaOH. The implants were press fitted into the intramedullary canal of mature New Zealand white rabbits and analyzed, both at the diaphyseal and at the metaphyseal zones, either 1 week or 12 weeks after surgery. NaOH-ED-HAp already exhibited a higher BAR value than the ED-HAp at 1 week, and was as good as the commercial PS-HAp at 12 weeks. The NBA value for NaOH-ED-HAp at 12 weeks was the highest. The higher content of octacalcium phosphate in NaOH-ED-HAp, as evident from the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of the oxygen shake-up peaks, and the associated increase in the solubility of this coating in vivo are considered responsible for the enhanced osseointegration. Taking into account also the reduced occurrence of delamination and the inherent advantages of the electrodeposition process, electrodeposition of HAp following soaking in NaOH may become an attractive alternative for the traditional plasma-sprayed process for coating of orthopedic and dental implants. (C) 2009 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据