4.3 Article

In vitro propagation of the endangered species Berberis aristata DC. via leaf-derived callus

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11627-015-9716-7

关键词

Berberis; berberin; In vitro regeneration; Callus; Endangered species

资金

  1. Uttarakhand State Biotechnology Department

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Berberis aristata, an endangered plant, is an important component in different medicinal formulations. The low seed germination rate coupled with fructification at high altitudes during the rainy season makes the task of seed collection difficult. In order to increase the yield of relevant plant material for medicinal and conservation purposes, an efficient in vitro regeneration protocol is important. Regeneration of endangered B. aristata from leaf-derived callus may offer an efficient alternative to natural propagation through seeds. When compared with nodal segments taken from in vitro-germinated seedlings and inoculated onto the same medium, leaf-derived callus was found to be better for shoot induction and multiplication. In optimization experiments, the rate of shoot multiplication from leaf-derived callus was increased from 17.6 +/- 0.6 to 26.5 +/- 0.2 shoots per callus by supplementing Woody Plant (WP) medium with 0.5 mu M thidiazuron (TDZ) in place of 8.88 mu M benzyladenine (BA) + 2.68 mu M naphthalene acetic acid (NAA). Although shoot length was decreased when using TDZ, this could be alleviated by gibberellic acid (GA(3)) treatment. Rooting was achieved on half-strength WP medium supplemented with indole butyric acid (IBA) in either a one- or two-step rooting method. The two-step rooting procedure was found to be superior; under the best overall conditions, 55.6 +/- 2.1% of plantlets formed roots within 25.7 +/- 0.3 d. Well-rooted plantlets were successfully established in earthen pots under greenhouse conditions, with a 61.1% survival rate. This procedure is suitable for large-scale production of plants via in vitro propagation for this endangered plant species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据