Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand adherence to multiple evidence-based indicators in primary care: a qualitative study
出版年份 2015 全文链接
标题
Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand adherence to multiple evidence-based indicators in primary care: a qualitative study
作者
关键词
Primary care, Diabetes, Hypertension, Prescribing, Atrial fibrillation, Theoretical Domains Framework, Guideline implementation, Qualitative, Interviews
出版物
Implementation Science
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -
出版商
Springer Nature
发表日期
2016-08-08
DOI
10.1186/s13012-016-0479-2
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Developing ‘high impact’ guideline-based quality indicators for UK primary care: a multi-stage consensus process
- (2015) Bruno Rushforth et al. BMC Family Practice
- Managing patients with multimorbidity in primary care
- (2015) E. Wallace et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Managing patients with multimorbidity in primary care
- (2015) E. Wallace et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Self-reported quality of care for older adults from 2004 to 2011: a cohort study
- (2014) N. Steel et al. AGE AND AGEING
- Understanding diagnosis and management of dementia and guideline implementation in general practice: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework
- (2014) Kerry Murphy et al. Implementation Science
- The effects of financial incentives for case finding for depression in patients with diabetes and coronary heart disease: interrupted time series analysis
- (2014) K. McLintock et al. BMJ Open
- The management of atrial fibrillation: summary of updated NICE guidance
- (2014) C. Jones et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Barriers to the implementation of preconception care guidelines as perceived by general practitioners: a qualitative study
- (2013) Danielle Mazza et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Patient Factors Influencing the Prescribing of Lipid Lowering Drugs for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in UK General Practice: A National Retrospective Cohort Study
- (2013) Jianhua Wu et al. PLoS One
- Guidelines for people not for diseases: the challenges of applying UK clinical guidelines to people with multimorbidity
- (2012) L. D. Hughes et al. AGE AND AGEING
- A cross-country comparison of intensive care physicians’ beliefs about their transfusion behaviour: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework
- (2012) Rafat Islam et al. Implementation Science
- ‘It’s a can of worms’: understanding primary care practitioners’ behaviours in relation to HPV using the theoretical domains framework
- (2012) Lisa A McSherry et al. Implementation Science
- Anesthesiologists’ and surgeons’ perceptions about routine pre-operative testing in low-risk patients: application of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify factors that influence physicians’ decisions to order pre-operative tests
- (2012) Andrea M Patey et al. Implementation Science
- Knowledge translation of research findings
- (2012) Jeremy M Grimshaw et al. Implementation Science
- Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research
- (2012) James Cane et al. Implementation Science
- Why do doctors and patients not follow guidelines?
- (2009) Ilaria Baiardini et al. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology
- Why don't physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners
- (2009) Marjolein Lugtenberg et al. Implementation Science
- Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science
- (2009) Laura J Damschroder et al. Implementation Science
- Effects of Pay for Performance on the Quality of Primary Care in England
- (2009) Stephen M. Campbell et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started