4.8 Article

Transformation-Optics Description of Plasmonic Nanostructures Containing Blunt Edges/Corners: From Symmetric to Asymmetric Edge Rounding

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 6492-6506

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn3022684

关键词

plasmonics; blunt nanostructures; transformation optics; broadband light harvesting; Fano resonance

资金

  1. Lee family scholarship
  2. European Community [213390]
  3. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  4. Leverhulme Trust
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H000917/1, EP/D063329/1, EP/H000917/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/D063329/1, EP/H000917/2, EP/H000917/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sharpness of corners/edges can have a large effect on the optical responses of metallic nanostructures. Here we deploy the theory of transformation optics to analytically investigate a variety of blunt plasmonic structures, including overlapping nanowire dimers and crescent-shaped nanocylinders. These systems are shown to support several discrete optical modes, whose energy and line width can be controlled by tuning the nanoparticle geometry. In particular, the necessary conditions are highlighted respectively for the broadband light absorption effect and the invisibility dips that appear in the radiative spectrum. More detailed discussions are provided especially with respect to the structures with asymmetric edge rounding. These structures can support additional subradiant modes, whose interference with the neighboring dipolar modes results in a rapid change of the scattering cross-section, similar to the phenomenon observed in plasmonic Fano resonances. Finite element numerical calculations are also performed to validate the analytical predictions. The physical insights into blunt nanostructures presented in this work may be of great interest for the design of broadband light-harvesting devices, invisible and noninvasive biosensors, and slowing-light devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据