4.6 Article

Epitope-Guided Engineering of Monobody Binders for in Vivo Inhibition of Erk-2 Signaling

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 608-616

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cb300579e

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF CAREER [1053608]
  2. NSF [MCB-0917896]
  3. New York State Stem Cell Science Trust (NYSTEM) [C024355]
  4. NIH [R01HL103709]
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1053608] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the affinity optimization of protein binders is straightforward, engineering epitope specificity is more challenging. Targeting a specific surface patch is important because the biological relevance of protein binders depends on how they interact with the target. They are particularly useful to test hypotheses motivated by biochemical and structural studies. We used yeast display to engineer monobodies that bind a defined surface patch on the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) Erk-2. The targeted area (CD domain) is known to control the specificity and catalytic efficiency of phosphorylation by the kinase by binding a linear peptide (D peptide) on substrates and regulators. An inhibitor of the interaction should thus be useful for regulating Erk-2 signaling in vivo. Although the CD domain constitutes only a small percentage of the surface area of the enzyme (similar to 5%), sorting a yeast displayed monobody library with wild type (wt) Erk-2 and a rationally designed mutant led to isolation of high affinity clones with desired epitope specificity. The engineered binders inhibited the activity of Erk-2 in vitro and in mammalian cells. Furthermore, they specifically inhibited the activity of Erk-2 orthologs in yeast and suppressed a mutant phenotype in round worms caused by overactive MAPK signaling. The study therefore shows that positive and negative screening can be used to bias the evolution of epitope specificity and predictably design inhibitors of biologically relevant protein-protein interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据