4.8 Article

Permselective H-2/CO2 Separation and Desalination of Hybrid GO/rGO Membranes with Controlled Pre-cross-linking

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 33, 页码 28166-28175

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b05296

关键词

graphene oxide; hybrid membrane; gas separation; desalination; selectivity

资金

  1. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [55570-DNI10]
  2. NSF [CBET-1603264]
  3. National Energy Solutions Institute-Smart Energy Source (NESI-SES)
  4. Technology and Business Development Program (TBDP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Covalent bonding is widely adopted in graphene oxide (GO) membrane to improve structural integrity and restrict swelling, while it comes with a price of enlarged d-spacing and sacrifices membrane selectivity. This work offers a facile strategy to break the trade-off between membrane stability and selectivity. Specifically, graphene oxide (GO)/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) hybrid membranes were fabricated by a controlled pre-cross-linking method. With this method, restricted swelling by cross-linking and reduced d-spacing by GO reduction can be achieved simultaneously by controlling reaction time. Membranes were prepared on porous alumina support by vacuum filtration method. Two different d-spacing values (similar to 12.0 and similar to 7.5 angstrom) were found in the hybrid membrane, representing the layer structures of expanded GO interspacing with inserted cross-linker and reduced layer spacing after GO reduction. The presence of such mixed layer structures enables restricted swelling, excellent mechanical strength, and unique separation property. The hybrid membrane shows excellent permselective H-2/CO2 separation with a separation factor of 22.93 +/- 1.57 and H-2 permeance of 2.46 +/- 0.01x10(-8) mol m(-2) s(-1) Pa-1. In desalination test with 3.5 wt % sea salt solution, the hybrid membrane shows high ion (Na+, K+, Mg2+, Cl-, and SO42-) rejection rate of above 99%, as well as excellent durability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据