4.8 Article

Selective Optical Response of Hydrolytically Stable Stratified Si Rugate Mirrors to Liquid Infiltration

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 2884-2892

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am405436d

关键词

porous silicon; rugate filter; hydrolytic stability; photonic crystal; chemical modification; thermal carbonization

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Scientific Research [22350092]
  2. MEXT
  3. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science Technology
  4. Emil Aaltosen Saatio
  5. Scandinavia-Japan Sasakawa Foundation
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22350092] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stratified optical filters with distinct spectral features and layered surface chemistry were prepared on silicon substrates with stepwise anodic porosification and thermal carbonization. The use of differing parameters for successive carbonization treatments enabled the production of hydrolytically stable porous silicon-based layered optical structures where the adsorption of water to the lower layer is inhibited. This enables selective shifting of reflectance bands by means of liquid infiltration. The merit of using thermal carbonization for creating layered functionality was demonstrated by comparing the hydrolytic stability resulting from this approach to other surface chemistries available for Si. The functionality of the stratified optical structures was demonstrated under water and ethanol infiltration, and changes in the adsorption properties after 9 months of storage were evaluated. The changes observed in the structure were explained using simulations based on the transfer matrix method and the Bruggeman effective medium approximation. Scanning electron microscopy was used for imaging the morphology of the porous structure. Finally, the adaptability of the method for preparing complex structures was demonstrated by stacking superimposed rugate structures with several reflective bands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据