4.6 Article

Do State Medical Board Applications Violate the Americans With Disabilities Act?

期刊

ACADEMIC MEDICINE
卷 84, 期 6, 页码 776-781

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a43bb2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Family Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To determine whether medical licensing board, application questions about the mental or physical health or substance use history of the applicant violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. Method Content analysis of 51 allopathic licensing applications (50 states and District of Columbia) was performed at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School in 2005. Questions referencing physical or mental health or substance use were identified by a team of physicians and reviewed and categorized based on the ADA and appropriate case law by legal counsel. Results Of the 51 applications reviewed, 49 (96%) contained questions pertaining to the physical or mental health or substance use history of the applicant. Thirty-four of the 49 (69%) state medical licensing applications contained at least one likely impermissible or impermissible item based on the ADA and appropriate case law. Conclusions Most state medical licensing applications contain questions that ask about the physical or mental health and substance use of physician applicants. Many licensing applications appear to be in violation of the ADA, even 19 years after enactment of the regulation. These questions do not elicit responses by which professional competence can be judged. The presence of these questions on licensing applications may cause physicians to avoid or delay treatment of personal illness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据