4.3 Article

Robust collaborative recommendation algorithm based on kernel function and Welsch reweighted M-estimator

期刊

IET INFORMATION SECURITY
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 257-265

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0488

关键词

recommender systems; matrix algebra; groupware; MovieLens dataset; nonlinear inner product operation; similarity computation; median based method; shilling attacks; MF; matrix factorisation; Welsch reweighted M-estimator; kernel function; robust collaborative recommendation algorithm

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61379116]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, China [F2013203124, F2015203046]
  3. Research on Science and Technology of Higher Education Institutions of Hebei Province, China [ZH2012028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The existing collaborative recommendation algorithms based on matrix factorisation (MF) have poor robustness against shilling attacks. To address this problem, in this study the authors propose a robust collaborative recommendation algorithm based on kernel function and Welsch reweighted M-estimator. They first propose a median-based method to calculate user and item biases, which can reduce the influence of shilling attacks on user and item biases because median is insensitive to outliers. Then, they present a method of similarity computation based on kernel function, which can obtain the information of similar users by non-linear inner product operation. Finally, they combine the user and item biases based on median and the similarity based on kernel function with MF model, and introduce the Welsch reweighted M-estimator to realise the robust estimation of user feature matrix and item feature matrix. The experimental results on the MovieLens dataset show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the existing algorithms in terms of both recommendation accuracy and robustness, and the improvement of its robustness is not at the expense of recommendation accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据