4.6 Article

Paracellular Tightness and Claudin-5 Expression is Increased in the BCEC/Astrocyte Blood-Brain Barrier Model by Increasing Media Buffer Capacity During Growth

期刊

AAPS JOURNAL
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 759-770

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1208/s12248-010-9237-6

关键词

blood-brain barrier; buffer capacity; drug delivery; in vitro model; tight junction regulation

资金

  1. Carlsberg foundation
  2. Predicting Drug Absorption Consortium
  3. Novo Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most attempts to develop in vitro models of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) have resulted in models with low transendothelial electrical resistances (TEER), as compared to the native endothelium. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of culture pH and buffer concentration on paracellular tightness of an established in vitro model of the BBB consisting of bovine brain capillary endothelial cells (BCEC) co-cultured with rat astrocytes. BCEC and rat astrocytes were isolated and co-cultured using astrocyte-conditioned media with cAMP increasing agonists and dexamethasone. The co-culture had average TEER values from 261 +/- 26 Omega cm(2) to 760 +/- 46 Omega cm(2) dependent on BCEC isolation batches. Furthermore, mRNA of occludin, claudin-1, claudin-5, JAM-1, and ZO-1 were detected. Increased buffer concentration by addition of HEPES, MOPS, or TES to the media during differentiation increased the TEER up to 1,638 +/- 256 Omega cm(2) independent of the type of buffer. This correlated with increased expression of claudin-5, while expression of the other tight junction proteins remained unchanged. Thus, we show for the first time that increased buffer capacity of the medium during differentiation significantly increases tightness of the BCEC/ astrocyte in vitro BBB model. This regulation may be mediated by increased claudin-5 expression. The observations have practical implications for generating tighter BBB cell culture models, and may also have physiological implications, if similar sensitivity to pH-changes can be demonstrated in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据