4.3 Article

Materials considerations for forming the topological insulator phase in InAs/GaSb heterostructures

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.064603

关键词

-

资金

  1. Microsoft Research Station Q
  2. MRSEC program of the NSF [DMR-1121053, DMR-1720256]
  3. Center for Emergent Materials, a NSF MRSEC [DMR-1420451]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In an ideal InAs/GaSb bilayer of appropriate dimension, in-plane electron and hole bands overlap and hybridize, and a topologically nontrivial, or quantum spin Hall (QSH) insulator, phase is predicted to exist. The in-plane dispersion's potential landscape, however, is subject to microscopic perturbations originating from material imperfections. In this work, the effect of disorder on the electronic structure of InAs/GaSb (001) bilayers was studied by observing the temperature and magnetic-field dependence of the resistance of a dual-gated heterostructure gate-tuned through the inverted to normal gap regimes. Conduction with the electronic structure tuned to the inverted (predicted topological) regime and the Fermi level in the hybridization gap was qualitatively similar to behavior in a disordered two-dimensional system. The impact of charged impurities and interface roughness on the formation of topologically protected edge states and an insulating bulk was estimated. The experimental evidence and estimates of disorder in the potential landscape indicated that the potential fluctuations in state-of-the-art films are sufficiently strong such that conduction with the electronic structure tuned to the predicted topological insulator (TI) regime and the Fermi level in the hybridization gap was dominated by a symplectic metal phase rather than a TI phase. The implications are that future efforts must address disorder in this system, and focus must be placed on the reduction of defects and disorder in these heterostructures if a TI regime is to be achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据