4.5 Article

A change in the wind? US public views on renewable energy and climate compared

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13705-018-0152-5

关键词

Climate change; Renewable energy; Wind; Solar; Survey; Public opinion

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IIP-1230460, 1430260, DUE-1239783]
  2. Carsey School of Public Policy
  3. Sustainability Institute at the University of New Hampshire
  4. Agricultural and Food Research Initiative, US Department of Agriculture [2014-68002-21782, 2010-67023-21705]
  5. New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
  6. New Hampshire EPSCoR Safe Beaches and Shellfish project [IIA-1330641]
  7. Division Of Undergraduate Education
  8. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1239783] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  10. Directorate For Engineering [1430260] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. NIFA [2014-68002-21782, 687305, 580424, 2010-67023-21705] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Renewable energy development is a necessary step toward climate change mitigation, so these topics have often been linked. In US public discourse, however, they have somewhat different profiles-climate change views are tied closely to partisan identity, whereas renewable energy exhibits more cross-cutting appeal, and sometimes more cross-cutting opposition as well. To what extent are such differences reflected in survey data tracking rates of change, respondent characteristics, and local or regional variations in public opinion on renewable energy and climate? Methods: We explore similarities and differences in views of renewable energy and climate change using a unique collection of 18 US national or regional surveys totaling more than 14,000 interviews, conducted between 2011 and 2017. Individual surveys varied in context, content, and goals, but all asked two common energy and climate questions, which yield comparable and strikingly consistent results. Results: Public support for renewable energy appears broader than acceptance of anthropogenic climate change (ACC), especially in a more conservative region. Despite local controversies, support for renewable energy in recent years rose faster than ACC acceptance on two regional surveys. Political divisions remain wide on both topics, but wider regarding climate change-particularly among college-educated respondents. Renewable energy views in counties with proposed or operating wind farms are not systematically different from those in other counties. Conclusions: Overall, these results provide encouragement for promoting renewable energy in terms of its economic benefits, working around some of the political identity-based resistance to climate change mitigation. That approach could be most important in politically conservative regions where such resistance is strong.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Generation gaps in US public opinion on renewable energy and climate change

Lawrence C. Hamilton, Joel Hartter, Erin Bell

PLOS ONE (2019)

Article Environmental Sciences

Finding common ground: agreement on increasing wildfire risk crosses political lines

Joel Hartter, Lawrence C. Hamilton, Mark J. Ducey, Angela E. Boag, Jonathan D. Salerno, Nils D. Christoffersen, Paul T. Oester, Michael W. Palace, Forrest R. Stevens

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2020)

Article Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences

Summer Extreme Cyclone Impacts on Arctic Sea Ice

Jennifer Lukovich, Julienne C. Stroeve, Alex Crawford, Lawrence Hamilton, Michel Tsamados, Harry Heorton, Francois Massonnet

Summary: The study investigates the impact of extreme cyclones on Arctic sea ice in summer, focusing on the thermodynamic and dynamic contributions to sea ice volume budgets in 2012 and 2016. Results show that sea ice loss in the vicinity of cyclones in these two years was associated with different dominant processes, and the timing and location of the cyclones also play a key role in influencing Arctic sea ice extent.

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE (2021)

Article Sociology

Elite Cues and the Rapid Decline in Trust in Science Agencies on COVID-19

Lawrence C. Hamilton, Thomas G. Safford

Summary: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted political divisions in U.S. public trust of scientists, with Republicans showing a significant decline in trust towards science agencies like the CDC. This decline in trust coincided with a reversal of views towards these agencies expressed by President Trump and amplified by conservative media.

SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES (2021)

Article Political Science

Interaction effects on support for climate-change mitigation

Adrienne R. Brown, Lawrence C. Hamilton

Summary: Research on environmental concern has found that supporters of President Trump show particularly low concern for climate change, while interactions between education and political identity significantly impact support for climate change strategies. This provides important insights for public policy decision making related to climate change by considering predictive characteristics for support of specific strategies.

SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY (2021)

Article Political Science

Scientists, presidents, and pandemics-comparing the science-politics nexus during the Zika virus and COVID-19 outbreaks

Thomas G. Safford, Emily H. Whitmore, Lawrence C. Hamilton

Summary: This study investigates how beliefs about scientists and presidents influence views on pandemics, specifically Zika virus and COVID-19. Results show that support for presidents predicts perceptions of scientists' integrity and trust in government responses, with a shift in direction from 2016 to 2020. Trust in science agencies and government efforts during pandemics is also influenced by beliefs about scientists' objectivity and political leanings.

SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY (2021)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

Forecast Skill of the Arctic Sea Ice Outlook 2008-2022

Edward Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, Mitchell Bushuk, Francois Massonnet, Lawrence C. Hamilton, Cecilia M. Bitz, Walter N. Meier, Uma S. Bhatt

Summary: We evaluated the skill of Arctic September sea ice forecasts in the Sea Ice Outlook from 2008 to 2022. The multi-model median forecast initialized in June showed slightly higher skill than a damped anomaly forecast, while the July and August initialized forecasts did not perform better. The individual dynamical and statistical forecasts had lower skill compared to the multi-model median forecast. The overall skill was lower than expected based on retrospective forecasts. Some forecasts initialized in early September 2021 and 2022 had physically improbable values. Spatial forecasts of sea ice concentration showed skill in multi-model forecasts and improvement in individual forecast skill in recent years. Initial conditions exhibited large spread in sea ice volume and a positive correlation between initialized sea ice volume and September SIE forecast. Forecast error was influenced by summer weather.

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2023)

Article Environmental Sciences

Experience exceeds awareness of anthropogenic climate change in Greenland

Kelton Minor, Manumina Lund Jensen, Lawrence Hamilton, Mette Bendixen, David Dreyer Lassen, Minik T. Rosing

Summary: While Greenland is a hub for climate science, the climate perceptions of its Indigenous population have been largely unexplored. Two nationally representative surveys reveal that Greenlanders are more likely to believe in and have experienced climate change compared to residents of other Arctic countries. However, many are unaware that climate change is caused by human activities, and those most affected by it seem to be the least informed. This disconnect between personal experience and knowledge of human-induced climate change is influenced by cultural factors. Bridging this gap is crucial for climate adaptation, science communication, and knowledge transfer in Greenland.

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2023)

Article Environmental Sciences

I'll be dammed! Public preferences regarding dam removal in New Hampshire

Natallia Leuchanka Diessner, Catherine M. Ashcraft, Kevin H. Gardner, Lawrence C. Hamilton

ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE (2020)

Article Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

Views of the Highway: Infrastructure Reality, Perceptions, and Politics

Linda M. Fogg, Lawrence C. Hamilton, Erin S. Bell

SAGE OPEN (2020)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Wolves are back: Sociopolitical identity and opinions on management ofCanis lupus

Lawrence C. Hamilton, Joanna E. Lambert, Lydia Anne Lawhon, Jonathan Salerno, Joel Hartter

CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE (2020)

Article Environmental Studies

Questioning scientific practice: linking beliefs about scientists, science agencies, and climate change

Thomas G. Safford, Emily H. Whitmore, Lawrence C. Hamilton

ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGY (2020)

Article Development Studies

Characterizing Non-Industrial Private Forest Landowners' Forest Management Engagement and Advice Sources

Morgan A. Crowley, Joel Hartter, Russell G. Congalton, Lawrence C. Hamilton, Nils D. Christoffersen

SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES (2019)

Article Ecology

Climate change beliefs and forest management in eastern Oregon: implications for individual adaptive capacity

Angela E. Boag, Joel Hartter, Lawrence C. Hamilton, Nils D. Christoffersen, Forrest R. Stevens, Michael W. Palace, Mark J. Ducey

ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY (2018)

Article Environmental Sciences

Does it matter if people think climate change is human caused?

Joel Hartter, Lawrence C. Hamilton, Angela E. Boag, Forrest R. Stevens, Mark J. Ducey, Nils D. Christoffersen, Paul T. Oester, Michael W. Palace

CLIMATE SERVICES (2018)

暂无数据