4.5 Article

3D convolutional neural network for differentiating pre-invasive lesions from invasive adenocarcinomas appearing as ground-glass nodules with diameters ≤3 cm using HRCT

期刊

出版社

AME PUBLISHING COMPANY
DOI: 10.21037/qims.2018.06.03

关键词

Pre-invasive lesions (PILs); invasive adenocarcinomas (IACs); 3D convolution neural network (3D CNN); automatic diagnosis

资金

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Funds [20130424]
  2. NSFC [81371550]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Identification of pre-invasive lesions (PILs) and invasive adenocarcinomas (IACs) can facilitate treatment selection. This study aimed to develop an automatic classification framework based on a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) to distinguish different types of lung cancer using computed tomography (CT) data. Methods: The CT data of 1,545 patients suffering from pre-invasive or invasive lung cancer were collected from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. All of the data were preprocessed through lung mask extraction and 3D reconstruction to adapt to different imaging scanners or protocols. The general flow for the classification framework consisted of nodule detection and cancer classification. The performance of our classification algorithm was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, with diagnostic results from three experienced radiologists. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC (area under the ROC curve) values of our proposed automatic classification method were 88.5%, 80.1%, 84.0%, and 89.2%, respectively. The results of the CNN classification method were compared to those of three experienced radiologists. The AUC value of our method (AUC = 0.892) was higher than those of all radiologists (radiologist 1:80.5%; radiologist 2:83.9%; and radiologist 3:86.7%). Conclusions: The 3D CNN-based classification algorithm is a promising tool for the diagnosis of pre-invasive and invasive lung cancer and for the treatment choice decision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据