4.7 Article

Parallel droplet microfluidics for high throughput cell encapsulation and synthetic microgel generation

期刊

MICROSYSTEMS & NANOENGINEERING
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/micronano.2017.76

关键词

droplets; microencapsulation; microgel; multilayer; parallel

资金

  1. NIH [R21EB020107]
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation [2-SRA-2014-287-Q-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cells can be microencapsulated in synthetic hydrogel microspheres (microgels) using droplet microfluidics, but microfluidic devices with a single droplet generating geometry have limited throughput, especially as microgel diameter decreases. Here we demonstrate microencapsulation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) in small (< 100 mu m diameter) microgels utilizing parallel droplet generators on a two-layer elastomer device, which has 600% increased throughput vs. single-nozzle devices. Distribution of microgel diameters were compared between products of parallel vs. single-nozzle configurations for two square nozzle widths, 35 and 100 mu m. Microgels produced on parallel nozzles were equivalent to those produced on single nozzles, with substantially the same polydispersity. Microencapsulation of hMSCs was compared for parallel nozzle devices of each width. Thirty five micrometer wide nozzle devices could be operated at twice the cell concentration of 100 mu m wide nozzle devices but produced more empty microgels than predicted by a Poisson distribution. Hundred micrometer wide nozzle devices produced microgels as predicted by a Poisson distribution. Polydispersity of microgels did not increase with the addition of cells for either nozzle width. hMSCs encapsulated on 35 mu m wide nozzle devices had reduced viability (similar to 70%) and a corresponding decrease in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion compared to hMSCs cultured on tissue culture (TC) plastic. Encapsulating hMSCs using 100 mu m wide nozzle devices mitigated loss of viability and function, as measured by VEGF secretion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据