4.6 Review

Tumor Resistance against ALK Targeted Therapy-Where It Comes From and Where It Goes

期刊

CANCERS
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers10030062

关键词

anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL); anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK); ALK inhibitors; non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); resistance to ALK inhibitors; targeted therapies; tyrosine kinase (TK)

类别

资金

  1. European Union Horizon Marie Sklodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network (ITN-ETN) Grant [675712]
  2. European Research Initiative for ALK-Related Malignancies (ERIA)
  3. [R01 CA196703-01]
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA196703] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is a validated molecular target in several ALK-rearranged malignancies, particularly in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which has generated considerable interest and effort in developing ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Crizotinib was the first ALK inhibitor to receive FDA approval for ALK-positive NSCLC patients treatment. However, the clinical benefit observed in targeting ALK in NSCLC is almost universally limited by the emergence of drug resistance with a median of occurrence of approximately 10 months after the initiation of therapy. Thus, to overcome crizotinib resistance, second/third-generation ALK inhibitors have been developed and received, or are close to receiving, FDA approval. However, even when treated with these new inhibitors tumors became resistant, both in vitro and in clinical settings. The elucidation of the diverse mechanisms through which resistance to ALK TKI emerges, has informed the design of novel therapeutic strategies to improve patients disease outcome. This review summarizes the currently available knowledge regarding ALK physiologic function/structure and neoplastic transforming role, as well as an update on ALK inhibitors and resistance mechanisms along with possible therapeutic strategies that may overcome the development of resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据