4.7 Article

Enhanced Immunosuppressive Properties of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Primed by Interferon-gamma

期刊

EBIOMEDICINE
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 261-273

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.002

关键词

Mesenchymal stem cell; Interferon-gamma; Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; Graft-versus-host disease; Cell therapy

资金

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI14C3484, HI15C2963]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesenchymal stemcells (MSCs) are of particular interest for the treatment of immune- related diseases owing to their immunosuppressive properties. In this study, we aimed to identify the effect of interferon (IFN)-gamma priming on immunomodulation by MSCs and elucidate the possible mechanism underlying their properties for the clinical treatment of allogeneic conflicts. Infusion ofMSCs primed with IFN-gamma significantly reduced the symptoms of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) inNOD-SCIDmice, thereby increasing survival ratewhen comparedwith naive MSC-infused mice. However, infusion of IFN-gamma-primed MSCs in which indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) was downregulated did not elicit this effect. The IDO gene was expressed in MSCs via the IFN-gamma-Janus kinase (JAK)signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) pathway, and the infusion of IDO-over-expressing MSCs increased survival rate in an in vivo GVHDmodel, similar to infusion of IFN-gamma-primed MSCs. These data indicate that IFN-gamma production by activated T-cells is correlated with the induction of IDO expression in MSCs via the IFN-gamma-JAK-STAT1 pathway, which in turn results in the suppression of T-cell proliferation. Our findings also suggest that cell therapy based on MSCs primed with IFN-gamma can be used for the clinical treatment of allogeneic conflicts, including GVHD. (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据