4.8 Article

Chronology of martian breccia NWA 7034 and the formation of the martian crustal dichotomy

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aap8306

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy by LLNL [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. NASA Mars Fundamental Research Program [NNH14AX56I]
  3. LLNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development project [17-ERD-001]
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H002472/1, ST/H002960/1, ST/K000918/1]
  5. Argon Isotope Facility at SUERC
  6. STFC [ST/H002960/1, ST/K000918/1, ST/H002472/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Martian meteorite Northwest Africa (NWA) 7034 and its paired stones are the only brecciated regolith samples from Mars with compositions that are representative of the average martian crust. These samples therefore provide a unique opportunity to constrain the processes of metamorphism and alteration in the martian crust, which we have investigated via U-Pu/Xe, 40Ar/39Ar, and U-Th-Sm/He chronometry. U-Pu/Xe ages are comparable to previously reported Sm-Nd and U-Pb ages obtained from NWA 7034 and confirm an ancient (>4.3 billion years) age for the source lithology. After almost 3000 million years (Ma) of quiescence, the source terrain experienced several hundred million years of thermal metamorphism recorded by the K-Ar system that appears to have varied both spatially and temporally. Such protracted metamorphism is consistent with plume-related magmatism and suggests that the source terrain covered an areal extent comparable to plume-fed edifices (hundreds of square kilometers). The retention of such expansive, ancient volcanic terrains in the southern highlands over billions of years suggests that formation of the martian crustal dichotomy, a topographic and geophysical divide between the heavily cratered southern highlands and smoother plains of the northern lowlands, likely predates emplacement of the NWA 7034 source terrain-that is, it formed within the first similar to 100 Ma of planetary formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据