4.7 Article

Moisture-triggered actuator and detector with high-performance: interface engineering of graphene oxide/ethyl cellulose

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-MATERIALS
卷 61, 期 10, 页码 1291-1296

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40843-018-9249-y

关键词

actuator; humidity responsiveness; interface optimization; graphene oxide; detector

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB932302]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1432133, 11621063, 21701164]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2060190084, WK2060190058]
  5. Major/Innovative Program of Development Foundation of Hefei Center for Physical Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Actuators that can directly convert other forms of environmental energy into mechanical work offer great application prospects in intriguing energy applications and smart devices. But to-date, low cohesion strength of the interface and humidity responsive actuators primarily limit their applications. Herein, by experimentally optimizing interface of bimorph structure, we build graphene oxide/ethyl cellulose bidirectional bending actuators - a case of bimorphs with fast and reversible shape changes in response to environmental humidity gradients. Meanwhile, we employ the actuator as the engine to drive piezoelectric detector. In this case, graphene oxide and ethyl cellulose are combined with chemical bonds, successfully building a bimorph with binary synergy strengthening and toughening. The excellent hygroscopicity of graphene oxide accompanied with huge volume expansion triggers giant moisture responsiveness greater than 90 degrees. Moreover, the open circuit voltage of piezoelectric detector holds a peak value around 0.1 V and exhibits excellent reversibility. We anticipate that humidity-responsive actuator and detector hold promise for the application and expansion of smart devices in varieties of multifunctional nanosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据