4.7 Article

Essential refinements of spherical nanoindentation protocols for the reliable determination of mechanical flow curves

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 69-80

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.003

关键词

Spherical nanoindentation; Tip calibration; Constant strain-rate tests; Strain-rate jump tests; Nanoindentation flow curves

资金

  1. Austrian Federal Government [837900]
  2. Bundesministerium fur Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie
  3. Bundesministerium fur Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend
  4. Styrian and Tyrolean Provincial Government
  5. Standortagentur Tirol [A7.19]
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P25325-N20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding and linking mechanical properties obtained by spherical indentation experiments to uniaxial data is extremely challenging. Since the first attempts in the early 20th century numerous advances gradually allowed to expand the output of indentation tests. Still, the extraction of flow curves from spherical nanoindentation has not yet been fully established, as tip shape problems and size effects impede a straight-forward implementation. Within this study, we show new calibration procedures originating from fundamental geometrical considerations to account for tip shape imperfections. This sets the base for strain-rate controlled tests, which in turn enables us to measure rate-dependent material properties either with constant strain-rate or by strain-rate jump tests. Finally, experimental evaluation of the constraint factor in consideration of the mechanical properties and induced strain enables the extraction of flow curves. Testing materials with refined microstructures ensures the absence of possible size-effects. This study contributes to a significant improvement of current experimental protocols and allows to move flow curve measurements from single spherical imprints one step closer to its implementation as a standard characterization technique for modern materials. (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据