4.8 Article

Check in or Not? A Stochastic Game for Privacy Preserving in Point-of-Interest Recommendation System

期刊

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 4178-4190

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2847302

关键词

Location privacy; point-of-interest (POI) recommendation; reinforcement learning; stochastic game; value iteration

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61571300]
  2. Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the growing popularity of mobile social networks, point-of-interest (POI) recommendation, which utilizes users' check-in data to suggest interesting places for users, has attracted much attention in recent years. The check-in data, containing time and location information, are closely related to the user's personal life. Due to privacy concerns, users are reluctant to share check-in data with the service provider (SP), which causes a negative effect on recommendations. It is important for the user to find a balance between privacy and recommendation quality. In this paper, we consider a POI recommendation scenario where an adversary can access the data that a user reports to the SP. The user sequentially decides whether to check in for the POI he has visited. A stochastic game model is proposed to analyze the interaction between the user and the adversary. To find a good policy for the user, two value iteration algorithms are applied. The proposed game has a large state set, which makes it difficult for policy learning. To deal with this problem, we use some tricks when implementing the minimax Q-learning algorithm, and a set of neural networks are trained to approximate the Q-functions. To evaluate the performance of the learning algorithms, we conduct a series of simulations by using real-world check-in data. Simulation results show that the proposed learning algorithms can help the user to make good decisions, in the sense that the user can get a high long-term return.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据