4.8 Article

Metagenomic analysis of basal ice from an Alaskan glacier

期刊

MICROBIOME
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0505-5

关键词

Microbiome; Metagenomics; Glacier; Basal ice layer

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFC0206300, 2015CB553402]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21750005, 31470532, 91543102, 31711530153]
  3. Beijing Nova Program [Z171100001117011]
  4. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [20161080152]
  5. NASA ASTEP Program [NNX11AJ89G]
  6. Tsinghua University-Peking University Center for Life Sciences (CLS)
  7. Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology
  8. NASA [NNX11AJ89G, 140942] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Glaciers cover similar to 10% of land but are among the least explored environments on Earth. The basal portion of glaciers often harbors unique aquatic microbial ecosystems in the absence of sunlight, and knowledge on the microbial community structures and their metabolic potential is very limited. Here, we provide insights into the microbial lifestyle present at the base of the Matanuska Glacier, Alaska. Results: DNA and RNA were extracted from samples of the Matanuska Glacier basal ice. Using Illumina MiSeq and HiSeq sequencing, we investigated the microbial diversity with the metagenomic shotgun reads and 16S ribosomal RNA data. We further assembled 9 partial and draft bacterial genomes from the metagenomic assembly, and identified key metabolic pathways such as sulfur oxidation and nitrification. Collectively, our analyses suggest a prevalence of lithotrophic and heterotrophic metabolisms in the subglacial microbiome. Conclusion: Our results present the first metagenomic assembly and bacterial draft genomes for a subglacial environment. These results extend our understanding of the chemical and biological processes in subglacial environments critically influenced by global climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据