4.4 Article

Effects of a PRECEDE-PROCEED model based ergonomic risk management programme to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms of ICU nurses

期刊

INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 89-97

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.02.007

关键词

Ergonomic risk; Ergonomic risk management program; Intensive care nurse; Musculoskeletal system; RULA

类别

资金

  1. IU Scientific Research Projects, Istanbul University - Turkey [55021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate effects of a PRECEDE-PROCEED Model based, nurse-delivered Ergonomic Risk Management Program (ERMP) in the aim of reducing musculoskeletal symptoms of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses. Methods: This pre-test post-test design for non-equivalent control groups study comprised 72 ICU nurses from two hospitals. A randomised sampling was done through the study population. The ERMP was delivered as an intervention including 26 weeks of follow-up. Data was collected by Descriptives of Nurses and Ergonomic Risk Reporting Form, Rapid Upper Risk Assessment Form (RULA), ICU Environment Assessment Form and Personal interviews form. Results: There was no difference between sociodemographic characteristics, work and general health conditions within intervention and control group. One month after the intervention, nurses had significant decrease in their total RULA scores during bending down and patient repositioning movements as 1.40 and 0.82, respectively. Six months after the ERMP, the mean total RULA scores of nurses during the patient repositioning was 4.39 +/- 1.49 which meant immediate further analyses and modifications recommended. After all, pain intensity scores, medication use due to pain, and RULA ergonomic risk scores were significantly decreased, while exercise frequency was increased. Conclusions: The ERMP was effective to increase exercise frequency and to decrease musculoskeletal pain and ergonomic risk levels of ICU nurses. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据