4.5 Article

Characterization of ultraviolet-quenching dissolved organic matter (DOM) in mature and young leachates before and after biological pre-treatment

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ew00544j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Environmental Research and Education Foundation (EREF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discharge of municipal landfill leachate into publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) is a common leachate management practice in the United States. However, the benefits of this option have diminished in many POTWs because leachate can significantly interfere with UV disinfection due to the introduction of UV-quenching substances (UVQS). This study aims to characterize UV-quenching dissolved organic matter (DOM) in different raw and sequencing batch reactor (SBR) pre-treated landfill leachates. Nine leachate samples, including four raw mature leachates, four SBR pre-treated mature leachates, and one young raw leachate, were investigated. The mature leachates, regardless of raw or SBR pre-treated ones, had lower biodegradability (low BOD5/COD), higher specific UV absorbance (SUVA), greater hydrophobic fraction, and more high molecular weight (MW) organic compounds than the young leachate. SUVA served as a useful indicator for the characterization of UV-quenching DOM, which exponentially declined with increasing BOD5/COD. The high SUVA of the mature leachates suggests a highly aromatic and hydrophobic character with a high fraction of aquatic humic matter and high MW compounds. In contrast, the low SUVA of the young leachate implies the presence of a high fraction of non-humic matter, a highly aliphatic character, and more low MW molecules. After the mature leachates were biologically pre-treated, the SUVA increased due to the partial degradation of high MW compounds. Results from fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM) analysis could effectively reflect the variation of hydrophobic DOM, but poorly indicated the presence of hydrophilic DOM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据