4.7 Article

circFGFR4 Promotes Differentiation of Myoblasts via Binding miR-107 to Relieve Its Inhibition of Wnt3a

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY-NUCLEIC ACIDS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 272-283

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.02.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772574]
  2. Program of National Beef Cattle and Yak Industrial Technology System [CARS-37]
  3. Applied Basic Research Program of Qinghai Province [2014-ZJ-710]
  4. Special Fund of Xinyang Normal University [2017001]
  5. bio-breeding capacity-building and industry specific projects from National Development and Reform Commission [2014-2573]
  6. Specific Projects of Science and Technology in Henan Province [141100110200]
  7. Science and Technology Co-ordinator Innovative Engineering projects of Shaanxi Province [2015KTCL02-08]
  8. project of breeding and application of Pinan Cattle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Muscle development is regulated under a series of complicate processes, and non-coding RNAs, such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs), have been reported to play important roles in regulating myoblast proliferation and differentiation. We found that miR-107 expression was high in skeletal muscle of Qinchuan cattle. Overexpression of miR-107 inhibited bovine myoblasts differentiation and protected cells from apoptosis. Wnt3a was identified as a target of miR-107 by luciferase activity, real-time qPCR, and western blotting assays. Knockdown of Wnt3a inhibited bovine myoblasts differentiation and apoptosis, and this effect was similar to miR-107 overexpression. We also found circFGFR4 to promote myoblasts differentiation and to induce cell apoptosis. Via luciferase screening and RNA pull-down assays, circFGFR4 was observed to sponge miR-107. Overexpression of circFGFR4 increased the expression of Wnt3a, whereas this effect was abolished by miR-107. These results demonstrated that circFGFR4 binding miR-107 promotes cell differentiation via targeting Wnt3a in bovine primary myoblasts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据