4.4 Review

Mcr colistin resistance gene: a systematic review of current diagnostics and detection methods

期刊

MICROBIOLOGYOPEN
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.682

关键词

Colistin; detection methods; diagnostics; mcr-1; polymyxin B

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resistance to colistin, mediated by chromosomal mutations and more recently, by plasmid-borne mcr genes, is increasingly being reported in bacterial isolates taken from humans, animals, farms, foods, and the environment. To easily identify and contain this quickly spreading menace, efficient diagnostics that are cheaper, faster, simpler, sensitive, and specific have become indispensable and urgently necessary. A thorough and systematic review of the literature available at Pubmed, ScienceDirect and Web of Science was thus undertaken to identify articles describing novel and efficient colistin resistance-and mcr gene detecting methods. From the final 23 studies included in this review, both phenotypic and molecular tests were found. The phenotypic tests consisted of novel culture media viz., SuperPolymyxin (TM), CHROMagar COL-APSE and LBJMR media, commercial automated MIC-determining instruments such as MICRONAUT-S, Vitek 2, BD Phoenix, Sensititre and MicroScan, and novel assays such as Colistin MAC test, Colispot, rapid polymxin NP test (RPNP), alteration of Zeta potential, modified RPNP test, MICRONAUT-MIC Strip, MIC Test Strip, UMIC System, and Sensitest (TM) Colistin. Molecular diagnostics consisted of the CT103XL microarray, eazyplexA (R) SuperBug kit, and TaqmanA/SYBR GreenA real-time PCR assays, with 100% sensitivity and specificity plus a shorter turnaround time (<3 hr). Based on the sensitivity, specificity, cost, required skill and turnaround time, the RPNP test and/or novel culture media is recommended for under-resourced laboratories while the Multiplex PCR or TaqmanA/SYBR GreenA real-time PCR assay alongside the RPNP or novel culture media is suggested for well-resourced ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据