4.5 Article

Bioinspired Reduced Graphene Oxide/Polyacrylonitrile-Based Carbon Fibers/CoFe2O4 Nanocomposite for Flexible Supercapacitors with High Strength and Capacitance

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 5, 期 9, 页码 1297-1305

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201800004

关键词

bioinspired; CoFe2O4; polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fibers; reduced graphene oxide; supercapacitors

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [B201312]
  2. Program for Young Teachers Scientific Research in Qiqihar University [2012k-M04]
  3. Analysis and Testing Center of the School of Materials Science and Engineering of Qiqihaer University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the first time, zero-dimensional (0D) CoFe2O4 nanoparticles, one-dimensional (1D) polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fibers (PBCF), and two-dimensional (2D) reduced graphene oxide (RGO) nanosheets were used as building blocks to create an integrated ternary nanocomposite paper with a nacre-like microstructure for flexible supercapacitors. Inspired by the mortar-brick toughening mechanism of nacre, hydrogen and covalent bonding were further introduced into the bioinspired paper with 0D CoFe2O4, 1D PBCF, and 2D RGO to realize increased mechanical properties through the synergistic toughening effects of the interfacial interactions of hydrogen and covalent bonding. These collaboratively lead to enhanced mechanical properties such as high tensile strength, exceptional toughness, and eminent electrical conductivity. When used as a free-standing flexible electrode, the bioinspired interconnected 3D network exhibits an outstanding volumetric capacity of 240 F.cm(-3) at 10 mV.s(-1) and an excellent cycle life of 2000 cycles for a flexible symmetric supercapacitor device (SSCD). Remarkably, the fabricated flexible SSCD can be cycled reversibly in the voltage range of -1 to 0 V and shows a maximum energy density of 33.33 mW.h cm(-3), suggesting great potential for practical applications in flexible energy storage devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据