4.6 Article

Body composition changes differ by gender in stomach, colorectal, and biliary cancer patients with cachexia: Results from a pilot study

期刊

CANCER MEDICINE
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 3695-3703

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1665

关键词

bioelectrical impedance analysis; body composition; cachexia; colorectal cancer; gender; phase angle

类别

资金

  1. University of Florida Opportunity Research Fund
  2. Clinical Translational Science Institute (CTSI)
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR001427]
  4. UF PRICE-UF Health Cancer Center Seed Grant Program
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR001427] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few studies have examined the possibility that cachexia may affect men and women differently. This pilot study assessed gender differences in body composition in stomach, colorectal, and biliary cancer patients with cachexia. A sample of 38 participants (Female: Male = 17:21, mean age 57.4 years) were included if they were undergoing chemotherapy and experienced weight loss of 5% or more over a 6-month period. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) was applied to measure body composition. Phase angle (PA) and levels of extra-/intracellular water (ECW; ICW) were determined. Data were analyzed first by gender and then compared to age- and gender-matched healthy controls from the NHANES-III dataset. PA was lower (P < .01) in both genders compared with healthy controls, and PA was lower in female patients compared with male patients (P = .03). Male cancer patients with lower PA also had lower ICW levels compared with healthy controls (r = .98, P < .01). For female patients, PA and ICW were negatively correlated (r = .897, P < .01). A lower ECW/ICW ratio was highly correlated (r = .969 for men, r = .639 for women) with increased PA in cancer patients. ICW changes are gender-specific in patients with GI cancer. ECW/ICW ratios and PA may be suitable surrogate markers for gender-specific changes in cell composition and health status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据