4.5 Article

Neurodegenerative disease biomarkers Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42, tau, and p-tau181 in the vervet monkey cerebrospinal fluid: Relationto normal aging, genetic influences, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy

期刊

BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.903

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid beta; cerebral amyloid angiopathy; cerebrospinal fluid; tau; vervet

资金

  1. Tau Consortium
  2. National Institutes of Health [F31 NS084556, P01 AG026276]
  3. NINDS Informatics Center for Neurogenetics and Neurogenomics [P30 NS062691]
  4. Vervet Research Colony [P40 RR019963/OD010965]
  5. Vervet Research Colony (Wake Forest School of Medicine)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The Caribbean vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) is a potentially valuable animal model of neurodegenerative disease. However, the trajectory of aging in vervets and its relationship to human disease is incompletely understood. Methods: To characterize biomarkers associated with neurodegeneration, we measured cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of A beta(1-40), A beta(1-42), total tau, and p-tau(181) in 329 members of a multigenerational pedigree. Linkage and genome-wide association were used to elucidate a genetic contribution to these traits. Results: A beta(1-40) concentrations were significantly correlated with age, brain total surface area, and gray matter thickness. Levels of p-tau(181) were associated with cerebral volume and brain total surface area. Among the measured analytes, only CSF A beta(1-40) was heritable. No significant linkage (LOD>3.3) was found, though suggestive linkage was highlighted on chromosomes 4 and 12. Genome-wide association identified a suggestive locus near the chromosome 4 linkage peak. Conclusions: Overall, these results support the vervet as a non-human primate model of amyloid-related neurodegeneration, such as Alzheimer's disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and highlight A beta(1-40) and p-tau(181) as potentially valuable biomarkers of these processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据