4.5 Article

Controlling Interfacial Properties of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes with Alkylphosphonate Self-Assembled Monolayers

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 5, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201701292

关键词

alkylphosphonate; lithium-ion battery cathode; lithium manganese oxide; self-assembled monolayers; surface modification

资金

  1. Center for Electrical Energy Science, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the preparation and characterization of modified LiMn2O4 (LMO) cathodes utilizing chemisorbed alkylphosphonic acids to chemically modify their surfaces are reported. Electrochemical methods to study ionic and molecular mobility through the alkylphosphonate self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) for different alkyl chain compositions, in order to better understand their impact on the lithium-ion electrochemistry, are utilized. Electrochemical trends for different chains correlate to trends observed in contact angle measurements and solvation energies obtained from computational methods, indicating that attributes of the microscopic wettability of these interfaces with the battery electrolyte have an important impact on ionic mobility. The effects of surface modification on Mn dissolution are also reported. The alkylphosphonate layer provides an important mode of chemical stabilization to the LMO, suppressing Mn dissolution by 90% during extended immersion in electrolytes. A more modest reduction in dissolution is found upon galvanostatic cycling, in comparison to pristine LMO cathodes. Taken together, the data suggest that alkylphosphonates provide a versatile means for the surface modification of lithium-ion battery cathode materials allowing the design of specific interfaces through modification of organic chain functionalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据