4.0 Article

Outdated Prescription Drug Labeling How FDA-Approved Prescribing Information Lags Behind Real-World Clinical Practice

期刊

THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE
卷 52, 期 6, 页码 771-777

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2168479018759662

关键词

FDA; labeling; off-label use; compendia; postmarket evidence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Prescription drug labeling is an authoritative source of information that guides the safe and effective use of approved medications. In many instances, however, labeling may fail to be updated as new information about drug efficacy emerges in the postmarket setting. When labeling becomes outdated, it loses its value for prescribers and undermines a core part of the FDA's mission to communicate accurate and reliable information to patients and physicians. Methods: We compared the number of drug uses indicated on product labels to the number of uses contained in a leading drug compendium for 43 cancer drugs approved between 1999 and 2011. We defined a well-accepted off-label use of a drug as one that was not approved by the FDA and received a category 1 or 2A evidence grade. Results: Of the 43 drugs reviewed in this study, 34 (79%) had at least one well-accepted off-label use. In total, 253 off-label uses were identified; 91% were well accepted, and 65% were in cancer types not previously represented on labeling. Off-patent drugs had more well-accepted off-label uses than brand-name drugs, on average (mean 13.7 vs 3.8, P = .018). Conclusions: The labeling for many cancer drugs, particularly for older drugs, is outdated. Although FDA-approved labeling can never be fully aligned with real-world clinical practice, steps should be taken to better align the two when high-quality data exist. Such steps, if taken, will assist patients and prescribers in discerning which uses of drugs are supported by the highest quality evidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据