4.8 Article

An effective strategy to enhancing tolerance to contaminants poisoning of solid oxide fuel cell cathodes

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 474-480

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.043

关键词

Fuel cell; Solid oxide fuel cell; Oxygen reduction; Cathode; Raman spectroscopy

资金

  1. US Department of Energy SECA Core Technology Program [FC FE0026106, FC-FE0009652]
  2. DOE ARPA-E REBELS Program [DE-AR0000502]
  3. Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [2014ZT05N200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commercialization of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) is impeded by severe cathode degradation from the poisoning effect of contaminants commonly encountered in air (such as H2O and CO2) and from other cell components (e.g., Cr species from chromium-containing interconnector). Here we report our findings in unraveling the mechanism of Cr-poisoning of La.Sr-6.Co-4.Fe-2.O-8(3) (LSCF) cathodes using our unique in situ/operando surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Further, we present an effective strategy to enhancing the tolerance to contaminants poisoning of LSCF cathode through infiltration of a hybrid catalyst coating, which is composed of a conformal film of perovskite PrNi.Mn-5.O-5(3) (PNM) and exsoluted PrOx nano-particles. The coating is catalytically active to oxygen reduction reaction but inert to contaminant poisoning. When subjected to an accelerated Crpoisoning test, the cells with a hybrid catalyst-coated LSCF cathode show excellent peak power density (P-max of 0.71 Wcm(-2)) and significantly enhanced durability (degradation rate of 0.0434% h(-1) at 0.7 V), much better than those of cells with a bare LSCF cathode (P-max of similar to 0.46 Wcm(-2) and degradation rate of 0.4% h(-1) at 0.7 V). The results suggest that surface modification of electrodes with a coating of rationally designed catalysts is a cost-effective approach to dramatically reducing electrode degradation caused by contaminations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据