4.8 Review

Breakthroughs in NiOx-HTMs towards stable, low-cost and efficient perovskite solar cells

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 408-424

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.082

关键词

Nickel Oxide; Low-cost; High-stability; Efficiency; Perovskite solar cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772096, 51372082, 51402106, 11504107]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [L172036]
  3. Joint Funds of the Equipment Pre-Research and Ministry of Education [6141A020225]
  4. National High-tech RAMP
  5. D Program of China (863 Program) [2015AA034601]
  6. Par-Eu Scholars Program, Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project [Z161100002616039]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016JQ01, 2017ZZD02]
  8. NCEPU Double First-Class Graduate Talent Cultivation Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although revolutionary progress in power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) greater than 22% has accompanied significant advances in materials engineering, processing, and device architectures, the selection of proper hole transporting materials (HTMs) is still critical for high efficiency, low-cost and long-term stability. The PSCs community is actively investigating a group of HTMs for high efficiency and long-term stability with commercial viability. In this context, inorganic nickel oxide (NiOx)-HTMs possess the advantages of energetically favorable energy band positions, high hole mobility, superior chemical stability, and low cost manufacturing. Herein, we address the initial breakthroughs and recent progress in NiOx-HTMs for PSCs. In addition to synthetic routes and deposition techniques used for NiOx-HTMs in two major device architectures (p-i-n and n-i-p structure), the stability and cost-breakdown of PSCs are evaluated in details. Finally, future directions for further improvements on issues such as high efficiency, stability and low-cost of PSCs based on NiOx-HTMs are also provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据