4.6 Article

Giant current amplification induced by ion migration in perovskite single crystal photodetectors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 6, 期 30, 页码 8042-8050

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8tc02334d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [FA 9550-15-1-0064]
  2. AOARD [FA2386-15-1-4104]
  3. National Science Foundation [CBET-1438181]
  4. Oak Ridge National Laboratory by the Division of Scientific User Facilities, the U.S. Department of Energy [CNMS2016-279, CNMS2016-R45]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61475051, 2014CB643506, 2013CB922104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single crystals of organic-inorganic hybrid perovskites have become attractive candidates for application in photodetection and high-energy radiation detection based on a unique solution growth method with a large interacting cross-section with electromagnetic waves in different energy regimes and high drift mobilities through optically induced polarization. However, inevitable ion migration often represents a technical difficulty in controlling the detection performance. This work reports giant current amplification induced by ion migration in the MAPbI(3) single crystal photodetectors with a lateral geometry of Au/MAPbI(3)/C-60/BCP/Ag based on light soaking studies. Upon light soaking, a stabilized device can demonstrate a giant amplification factor reaching 600 at -2 V under weak light illumination (1 mW cm(-2)). The time-dependent current profile shows a slow response during amplification under light soaking. This indicates that optically activated ions are driven away from working areas to the respective electrodes, leading to the reduction of dark current by decreasing bulk defects. Simultaneously, the accumulation of iodine anions and methylammonium cations at Ag and Au contacts can trigger the counter charge injection, largely amplifying the total electrical current and leading to giant current amplification in perovskite single crystal photodetectors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据