4.5 Article

Rock Slope Stability and Stabilization Analysis Using the Coupled DDA and FEM Method: NDDA Approach

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001098

关键词

Numerical method in geomechanics; Discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA); Nodal variable-based discontinuous deformation analysis (NDDA); Slope stability; Sarma method; Rock reinforcement

资金

  1. Underground Technology and Rock Engineering (UTRE) Program
  2. Nanyang Centre for Underground Space (NCUS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
  3. National Science Foundation of China [11402070, 41372266]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nodal variable-based discontinuous deformation analysis (NDDA), which couples the finite-element method (FEM) mesh inside a discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA) block, aims to improve the stress accuracy and the contact efficiency of the standard DDA method. This article investigates the performance of the NDDA method for slope stability problems. Because the NDDA model considers the entire block kinematics, the assumption on interslice forces among the blocks is no longer necessary. Therefore, the strain/displacement compatibility can be automatically satisfied. The comparison study shows that the factors of safety (FOSs) obtained by the NDDA method are different from those provided by the Sarma method. More intrinsic information, including the distribution pattern of the normal force along the potential slip surface, the distribution pattern of the interslice normal forces, and the ratio between of the interslice shear and normal forces, can be obtained from the NDDA simulation. However, to secure the potentially unstable block, a numerical rock bolt model is introduced into the NDDA framework to simulate the interactive mechanism between the rock mass and the reinforcement. The simulation result shows that the proposed rock bolt system is effective in stabilizing the slope in designed cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据