4.6 Article

Evolutionary Optimization of Expensive Multiobjective Problems With Co-Sub-Pareto Front Gaussian Process Surrogates

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 1708-1721

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2018.2811761

关键词

Expensive optimization; multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (EA); multitask Gaussian process (GP)

资金

  1. Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Center, Nanyang Technological University
  2. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61301298, 61575126, 61401283]
  4. Scientific Research and Development Foundation of Shenzhen [JCYJ20170302145554126]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a Gaussian process (GP) based co-sub-Pareto front surrogate augmentation strategy for evolutionary optimization of computationally expensive multiobjective problems. In the proposed algorithm, a multiobjective problem is decomposed into a number of subproblems, the solution of each of which is used to approximate a portion or sector of the Pareto front (i.e., a subPF). Thereafter, a multitask GP model is incorporated to exploit the correlations across the subproblems via joint surrogate model learning. A novel criterion for the utility function is defined on the surrogate landscape to determine the next candidate solution for evaluation using the actual expensive objectives. In addition, a new management strategy for the evaluated solutions is presented for model building. The novel feature of our approach is that it infers multiple subproblems jointly by exploiting the possible dependencies between them, such that knowledge can be transferred across subPFs approximated by the subproblems. Experimental studies under several scenarios indicate that the proposed algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for expensive problems. The parameter sensitivity and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm are analyzed in detail.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据