4.3 Article

Physical Activity Program Improves Functional Exercise Capacity and Flexibility in Extremely Preterm Children With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Aged 4-6 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA
卷 54, 期 12, 页码 607-613

出版社

ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2018.05.001

关键词

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia; Children; Exercise

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is the most common complication of extreme preterm delivery, and is associated with reduced exercise tolerance and exercise capacity. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a physical activity programme on exercise tolerance, exercise capacity, flexibility, and lung function in prematurely born children with BPD. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial. Preterm children with BPD (4-6 years) were randomized to intervention (IG) and control (CG) groups. The CG did not participate in any physical activity during the study period. The IC performed a 4-week exercise programme based on aerobic interval and resistance training. Outcomes were based on the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), modified sit and reach test (MSRT) and spirometry results. Results: Twenty individuals were recruited. In the IG (n = 10), statistical and clinical improvement was observed in the 6MWT (316.3 +/- 31.4 m vs 376.2 +/- 39.5 m; P = .002). Significant improvements were also seen in the IG in the ISWT (248.0 +/- 45.2 m vs 465.3 +/- 58.2 m; P = .013), MSRT (14.5 +/- 7.7 cm vs 22.8 +/- 6.9 cm; P = .003), and FEV1 (102% +/- 16% pred vs 104% +/- 17% pred; P = .004). No significant differences between pre- and post-intervention were observed in the CG for all outcomes (n = 10). Conclusion: This 4-week programme resulted in statistical and clinical improvements in exercise tolerance, exercise capacity and flexibility in preterm children with BPD. (C) 2018 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据