4.6 Review

Recent Advances in Group III-V Nanowire Infrared Detectors

期刊

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 6, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.201800256

关键词

controllable growth; III-V semiconductors; infrared detectors; nanowires

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0305500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11604152, 61725402, 5151101197]
  3. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2017MF037]
  4. Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20170307093131123]
  5. Qilu young scholar program of Shandong University
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20160815]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1D III-V semiconductor nanowires (NWs) attract significant interests in fundamental physics and promising applications of high-performance room-temperature infrared (IR) detectors. Here, a comprehensive overview of recent advances in the study of III-V NW-based IR detectors is presented, starting from the rationale of III-V NWs for IR detectors, the controllable synthesis of III-V NWs to the precise manipulation of III-V NW-based IR detector performances. With a bandgap covering the whole IR wavelength range and a high carrier mobility, III-V NWs are considered as the most optimal channel materials for high-performance IR detectors. The synthesis methods and growth mechanisms of high quality III-V NWs are discussed, emphasizing the low-cost solid source chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique, which is developed as the two-step and surfactant-assisted CVD methods in the growth of various III-V NWs. Next, the representative types of III-V NW IR detectors are discussed and typical strategies to resolve main challenges limiting the performance of III-V NW-based IR detectors are reviewed, including high density of surface trap states, large dark current, etc. Finally, the possible challenges and opportunities in the future development of III-V NW-based IR detectors are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据