4.6 Review

Poly(glycerol-co-diacids) Polyesters: From Glycerol Biorefinery to Sustainable Engineering Applications, A Review

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 5681-5693

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04837

关键词

Glycerol; Biorefinery; Polyglycerol; Polyesters; Biobased

资金

  1. Chilean National Scholarship Program for Graduate Studies from CONICYT-Chile
  2. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA), Canada/University of Guelph-Bioeconomy for Industrial Uses Research Program Theme [030251]
  3. OMAFRA, Canada New Directions Project [050155]
  4. Round-7 (ORF-RE07) [052850]
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Canada [401111, 400320]
  6. Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science (MRIS), Ontario Research Fund, Research Excellence Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Upgrading of biobased glycerol to commercial products is a necessary step on sustainable development of oleaginous biomass biorefining. The synthesis of poly(glycerol-co-diacid) polyester materials is an attractive option for glycerol usage that can produce a wide range of products of commercial interest. These polymeric materials could be used on industrial applications as biomedical devices, surfactants and in thermoplastic material development. In this review, the process engineering aspects leading to tailorable polymeric products are comprehensively analyzed with emphasis on control of molecular architecture and functionality. Molecular weight, degree of branching, mechanical properties and surface chemistry of the materials can be controlled by fine-tuning synthesis procedures to match custom specifications in end products. Potential usage of poly(glycerol-co-diacid) materials with tailored physicochemical properties on industrially relevant applications is presented. Advantages and challenges in the synthesis of these novel polymeric materials for value added application are addressed and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据