4.6 Editorial Material

Ten simple rules for responsible referencing

期刊

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006036

关键词

-

资金

  1. ZonMW programme Fostering Responsible Research Practices [45001005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

评论

Wai Lo
An interesting article to read. Referencing is one of the components of a paper but many people just simply ignore the importance. I think the Rule 2 "read the publications you cite" is important as I think not many people read and understand the articles they referred in their publications. Extensi...

推荐

Letter Medicine, General & Internal

Lowering the P Value Threshold

A. Cecile J. W. Janssens, Bart Penders

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)

Letter Medicine, General & Internal

Lowering the P Value Threshold

Paul Barach, Ronald L. Thomas, Steven E. Lipshultz

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)

Editorial Material Medical Ethics

Science's moral economy of repair: Replication and the circulation of reference

Bart Penders, Sarah de Rijcke, J. Britt Holbrook

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE (2020)

Review Immunology

Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in China: A Scoping Review of Chinese Scholarship

Ronghui Yang, Bart Penders, Klasien Horstman

VACCINES (2020)

Article Medical Ethics

Civil disobedience in scientific authorship: Resistance and insubordination in science

Bart Penders, David M. Shaw

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE (2020)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Do we measure or compute polygenic risk scores? Why language matters

Bart Penders, A. Cecile J. W. Janssens

Summary: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are distinct from other biomarkers as they are calculated, compiled or constructed through the statistical assemblage of genetic variants. How researchers frame and name PRSs impacts how we interpret and value their results. Important questions include what PRS seeks to represent, whether current ways of 'doing PRS' are optimal and responsible, and the basis for the credibility of PRS-based knowledge claims.

HUMAN GENETICS (2022)

Article Medical Ethics

Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values

Mohammad Hosseini, Enric Senabre Hidalgo, Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Stephan Guttinger, Bart Penders

Summary: Although adherence to Mertonian values of science can cause friction with the normative structures and practices of Open Science, new normative structures need to consider the aspirations and outcomes of Open Science practices. The intersection of Open Science practices with Mertonian values becomes complicated when interests of different groups collide. Acknowledging and exploring these tensions can inform researchers' behavior and improve their interactions with other normative structures.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2022)

Article Communication

Replicatie en de organisatie van communicatie ten behoeve van wetenschappelijke geloofwaardigheid

Bart Penders

Summary: This paper examines the importance of replication and replication studies in communication between scientists to enhance scientific credibility. However, not every epistemic culture agrees with this and there are alternative ways of organizing communication to achieve the same goal.

TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR COMMUNICATIEWETENSCHAP (2022)

Article Sociology

Stakeholder perspectives on infant formula safety governance in China: a decade after the melamine crisis

Ronghui Yang, Klasien Horstman, Bart Penders

Summary: This paper critically examines the dynamics of the Chinese food safety governance infrastructure after the melamine crisis, revealing tensions and gaps between different governance models. Despite the ideal of inclusive, transparent, and participatory governance, challenges still exist in effective problem-solving.

FOOD CULTURE & SOCIETY (2022)

Article Political Science

Constructing the accountability of food safety as a public problem in China: a document analysis of Chinese scholarship, 2008-2018

Ronghui Yang, Klasien Horstman, Bart Penders

Summary: Scholarly debates on public accountability for food safety in China aim to restore public trust and reflect on different strategies and perspectives. This analysis shows that arguments for specific accountability models and scientific expertise are intertwined, shaping a public forum for discussing supervision and accountability, risk assessment, and transparency.

JOURNAL OF CHINESE GOVERNANCE (2022)

Article Communication

Maybe a Long Fast Is Good for You: Health Conceptualisations in YouTube Diet Videos

Mu-Chi Chiu, Bart Penders

Summary: This paper explores how YouTubers promote and support health concepts, finding that they use new health concepts to replace traditional definitions, focusing on practical dietary issues and specific audiences.

FRONTIERS IN COMMUNICATION (2021)

Article Management

Do synthesis centers synthesize? A semantic analysis of topical diversity in research

Edward J. Hackett, Erin Leahey, John N. Parker, Ismael Rafols, Stephanie E. Hampton, Ugo Corte, Diego Chavarro, John M. Drake, Bart Penders, Laura Sheble, Niki Vermeulen, Todd J. Vision

Summary: Synthesis centers facilitate research that integrates diverse theories, methods, and data to enhance the generality, applicability, and empirical soundness of scientific explanations. By comparing the topical diversity of publications, it was found that synthesis center collaborations have greater variety and evenness in their papers compared to the reference corpus, with less disparity. The origins of synthesis centers, as well as diversity measures, significantly influence the visibility of publications.

RESEARCH POLICY (2021)

Article Immunology

Vaccine Hesitancy in China: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders' Perspectives

Ronghui Yang, Bart Penders, Klasien Horstman

VACCINES (2020)

Article Ethics

Allonymous science: the politics of placing and shifting credit in public-private nutrition research

Bart Penders, Peter Lutz, David M. Shaw, David M. R. Townend

LIFE SCIENCES SOCIETY AND POLICY (2020)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Rinse and Repeat: Understanding the Value of Replication across Different Ways of Knowing

Bart Penders, J. Britt Holbrook, Sarah de Rijcke

PUBLICATIONS (2019)

暂无数据