3.9 Article

Lobe-Specific Gene Vector Delivery to Rat Lungs Using a Miniature Bronchoscope

期刊

HUMAN GENE THERAPY METHODS
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 228-235

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/hgtb.2018.050

关键词

rat; lung; bronchoscopy; lobe; lentivirus

资金

  1. Fay Fuller Foundation Discovery Grant
  2. NHMRC [1098127]
  3. CF South Australia
  4. Cure4CF Foundation
  5. Robinson Research Institute Career Development Fellowship
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1098127] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For respiratory research utilizing gene vector delivery to the lung, the size of rodent models has typically necessitated relatively blind dosing via the nose, via an endotracheal tube, or through a surgical incision into the trachea. This commonly results in a limited ability to dose specific small regions of the lung reliably, and contributes to high levels of transduction variability between animals. The resultant poor reliability, reproducibility, and high variability compromises statistical capability, and so demands greater animal sample sizes than should be feasible. The first reliable targeted gene vector dosing of small regions in rat lungs has been designed and successfully implemented using a miniature rigid bronchoscope containing a working channel. Using this setup, this technique can currently access airway branches down to at least the fourth generation in the lungs of rats >200g in body weight, allowing dosing and re-dosing of specific lobes via airway branch points in the lung tree. Here, the protocol for performing this minimally invasive technique is reported, along with the effect of delivering vesicular stomatitis virus G pseudotyped lentivirus to selected lung lobes. Examples of other applications, such as delivery of agar beads, are also shown. It is expected that the availability of this technique will substantially enhance gene vector studies in rat models for a range of lung diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据