标题
The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study in Thailand
作者
关键词
-
出版物
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 1-8
出版商
Informa UK Limited
发表日期
2018-06-30
DOI
10.1080/14737167.2018.1494574
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L
- (2018) Kristina Ludwig et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Handling Data Quality Issues to Estimate the Spanish EQ-5D-5L Value Set Using a Hybrid Interval Regression Approach
- (2018) Juan M. Ramos-Goñi et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England
- (2017) Nancy J. Devlin et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Valuation and Modeling of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using a Hybrid Approach
- (2017) Juan M. Ramos-Goñi et al. MEDICAL CARE
- The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L Value Set
- (2017) Fredrick Dermawan Purba et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China
- (2017) Nan Luo et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Quality Control Process for EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies
- (2017) Juan M. Ramos-Goñi et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Logical inconsistencies in time trade-off valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states: Whose fault is it?
- (2017) Zhihao Yang et al. PLoS One
- A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada
- (2016) Feng Xie et al. MEDICAL CARE
- The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Korea
- (2016) Seon-Ha Kim et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan
- (2016) Takeru Shiroiwa et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Does the Introduction of the Ranking Task in Valuation Studies Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inconsistencies? The Case of the EQ-5D-5L
- (2016) Juan M. Ramos-Goñi et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D
- (2016) Matthijs M. Versteegh et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to EQ-5D-3L in the Thai diabetes patients
- (2015) Juntana Pattanaphesaj et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- An EQ-5D-5L value set based on Uruguayan population preferences
- (2015) Federico Augustovski et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- A Program of Methodological Research to Arrive at the New International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol
- (2014) Mark Oppe et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Health problems are more common, but less severe when measured using newer EQ-5D versions
- (2013) Benjamin M. Craig et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A Pilot Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Preferences for EQ-5D-5L Health States
- (2013) Richard Norman et al. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
- Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study
- (2012) M. F. Janssen et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Using health technology assessment for informing coverage decisions in Thailand
- (2012) Adun Mohara et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values
- (2011) Nick Bansback et al. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
- (2011) M. Herdman et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Estimating Population-Based Values for EQ-5D Health States in Thailand
- (2011) Sirinart Tongsiri et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- A uniform time trade off method for states better and worse than dead: feasibility study of the ‘lead time’ approach
- (2010) Nancy J. Devlin et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Discrete Choice Modeling for the Quantification of Health States: The Case of the EQ-5D
- (2010) Elly A. Stolk et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Historical development of health technology assessment in Thailand
- (2009) Yot Teerawattananon et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Comparing the Standard EQ-5D Three-Level System with a Five-Level Version
- (2007) Mathieu F. Janssen et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started