4.7 Article

Effects of Material-Tissue Interactions on Bone Regeneration Outcomes Using Baghdadite Implants in a Large Animal Model

期刊

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201800218

关键词

baghdadite; bone regeneration; ceramic scaffolds; degradation; material-tissue interactions

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council
  3. Rebecca L. Cooper Medical Research Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation under NSF [1541959]
  5. Emerging Fields Initiative ADVENDO LIFE of the Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extensive bone loss due to trauma or disease leads to impaired healing. Current bone grafts and substitutes have major drawbacks that limit their effectiveness for treating large bone defects. A number of bone substitutes in development are undergoing preclinical testing, but few studies specifically investigate the in vivo material-tissue interactions that provide an important indicator to long-term implant safety and efficacy. This study is the first of its kind to specifically investigate in vivo material-tissue interactions at the bone-implant interface. Baghdadite scaffolds implanted in critical-sized segmental defects in sheep tibia for 26 weeks are analyzed by focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy, multiphoton microscopy, and histology. The scaffolds are seen to induce extensive bone formation that directly abut the implant surfaces with no evidence of chronic inflammation or fibrous capsule formation. Bone remodeling is influenced by slow in vivo degradation around and within the implant, causing portions of the implant to be incorporated into the newly formed bone. These findings have important implications for predicting the long-term effects of baghdadite ceramics in promoting defect healing, and support the translation of baghdadite scaffolds as a new generation of bone graft substitutes with improved properties for the repair of large bone defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据